{"id":3813,"date":"2026-03-08T19:10:27","date_gmt":"2026-03-08T19:10:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/iranians.global\/news\/?p=3813"},"modified":"2026-03-08T19:38:20","modified_gmt":"2026-03-08T19:38:20","slug":"progress-on-rare-earth-exports-and-tensions-over-ukraine-mark-50-years-of-pragmatically-cautious-relations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/iranians.global\/news\/progress-on-rare-earth-exports-and-tensions-over-ukraine-mark-50-years-of-pragmatically-cautious-relations\/","title":{"rendered":"progress on rare earth exports and tensions over Ukraine mark 50 years of pragmatically cautious relations"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Gracia Abad Quintanal, Profesora Agregada de Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Nebrija<\/strong><\/a> <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Half a century after the establishment of relations between China and the EU, and against a backdrop of deteriorating transatlantic relations, the European Union and China held their 25th summit in Beijing. It is worth noting that the summit could not have been held elsewhere, as Chinese President Xi Jinping had refused an invitation to travel to Brussels<\/a>. <\/p>\n

Expectations were low<\/a>, but the summit yielded more substantial results than expected, most likely due to the shadow cast by the current US administration and its bullish foreign policy. <\/p>\n

Beyond the usual rhetoric about commitment to the relationship, respect for the principles of the United Nations and the rules-based international order, results<\/a> revolved around three main axes: global challenges, trade relations and current geopolitical issues.<\/p>\n

Global challenges<\/h2>\n

Both parties expressed a commitment to cooperation and joint leadership in the face of global challenges. This included environmental issues, which even warranted the publication of a joint press release<\/a>, as well as a shared commitment to multilateralism in an international context that is particularly hostile to it. <\/p>\n

With regard to the environment, both China and the EU have placed special emphasis on reducing emissions, as well as increasing financial contributions for this purpose and protecting biodiversity.<\/p>\n

While this first area saw a notable degree of agreement between China and the EU, the same cannot be said<\/a> for issues of trade and geopolitics.<\/p>\n

Trade relations<\/h2>\n

President of the European Commission, Ursula Von der Leyen, issued a strong warning about the need \u201crebalance\u201d the EU-China trade relationship<\/a>: \u201cAs our co-operation has deepened, so have imbalances\u201d, she said. Specifically, she referred to the need to reduce the EU\u2019s extremely high trade deficit with China, which reached \u20ac300 million in 2024<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In addition to existing tensions arising from the deficit, disagreements have recently emerged regarding the imposition of tariffs on certain products by each of the parties. These include levies imposed by the PRC on European pork and brandy, which are largely considered to be a retaliation against the EU\u2019s decision to impose tariffs on imported Chinese electric vehicles in October 2024.<\/p>\n

The EU, and the G7, have made efforts to reduce dependency on China, which Xi criticised directly<\/a>: \u201cBoosting competitiveness should not rely on building walls or barriers, as decoupling and severing supply chains will only result in self-isolation\u201d, he said.<\/p>\n

Despite tensions, there were also modest signs of progress \u2013 a tentative deal was struck to lift restrictions on Chinese exports of rare earth minerals to Europe, which had been in place since April 2025.<\/p>\n

Geopolitical issues<\/h2>\n

Restrictions on Chinese exports of rare earth minerals to Europe and tariffs imposed on electric vehicles are actually closely linked to the third of the major issues addressed at this summit: geopolitics. This is an area where disagreement between China and the EU has angered the Chinese government \u2013 more so than trade matters. <\/p>\n

However, unlike the United States, the EU has not opted for a policy of decoupling from Beijing, but rather for one of maintaining relations and derisking.<\/p>\n

Indeed, the European Union, like the US, fears that China may use its growing technological capabilities to project influence, interfere in other states, launch cyberattacks or control systems. Electric vehicles could become a very useful tool for these purposes.<\/p>\n

However, disagreements on international security between Europe and China do not end there. On the contrary, they have repeatedly clashed in recent years over the conflict in Ukraine<\/a>, which von der Leyen described as the \u201cdetermining factor\u201d<\/a> in EU-China relations.<\/p>\n

Since the beginning of Russia\u2019s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the EU has viewed China\u2019s refusal to condemn Russia\u2019s actions with considerable displeasure. It has also criticised China\u2019s ambivalence regarding the positions of Ukraine and Russia and, above all, the economic, political and military support provided by Beijing to the Russian Federation. <\/p>\n

This already prompted action from the EU in early 2024, in the form of sanctions against Chinese companies<\/a> for supplying Russia with components for the manufacture of weapons. <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
\n Read more:
\n Beijing’s ‘plausible deniability’ on arms supply is quickly becoming implausible — and could soon extend to Iran<\/a>
\n <\/strong>
\n <\/em>\n<\/p>\n\n

Unfortunately, the summit has not brought the two parties any closer to agreement on this issue<\/a>. It therefore seems unlikely that European efforts to convince China to pressure Russia into agreeing to a ceasefire will bear fruit. The tensions make sense if we consider that this is where certain core differences between the EU and China converge \u2013 specifically their conflicting models of international relations, and longstanding views on human rights.<\/p>\n

Limited results<\/h2>\n

Although the summit generated more results than many commentators expected, not all of them have been positive. Cooperation between the two powers has been rhetorically reinforced, but the meeting mainly served to once again underscore the enormous distance that separates Beijing from Brussels. For now, it seems that even the threat of the Trump administration\u2019s foreign policy cannot bring them any closer.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

This article written by Gracia Abad Quintanal, Profesora Agregada de Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Nebrija<\/strong> and is republished from The Conversation<\/a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Gracia Abad Quintanal, Profesora Agregada de Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Nebrija Half a century after the establishment of relations between China and the EU, and against a backdrop of deteriorating transatlantic relations, the European Union and China held their 25th summit in Beijing. It is worth noting that the summit could not have been held […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":179,"featured_media":3814,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"inline_featured_image":false,"fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[117],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3813","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-editorials"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iranians.global\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3813","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iranians.global\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iranians.global\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iranians.global\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/179"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iranians.global\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3813"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/iranians.global\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3813\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iranians.global\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3814"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iranians.global\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iranians.global\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3813"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iranians.global\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}